General movements assessment and Alberta Infant Motor Scale in neurodevelopmental outcome of preterm infants

dc.authoridKocaman, Canan/0000-0001-7736-3000
dc.authoridACAR, Gonul/0000-0002-6964-6614
dc.authorscopusid57205559224
dc.authorscopusid57862549600
dc.authorscopusid35108743000
dc.authorscopusid16041579200
dc.authorscopusid6603684367
dc.contributor.authorYildirim, Canan
dc.contributor.authorAsalioglu, Aysegul
dc.contributor.authorCoskun, Yesim
dc.contributor.authorAcar, Gonul
dc.contributor.authorAkman, Pek
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-25T11:26:30Z
dc.date.available2024-05-25T11:26:30Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentOkan Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Yildirim, Canan] Okan Univ, Fac Med, Dept Pediat, Div Pediat Neurol, Istanbul, Turkey; [Asalioglu, Aysegul] Istinye Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Istanbul, Turkey; [Coskun, Yesim] Koc Univ Hosp, Dept Pediat, Istanbul, Turkey; [Acar, Gonul] Marmara Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Istanbul, Turkey; [Akman, Pek] Bilim Univ, Fac Med, Dept Pediat, Div Neonatal, Istanbul, Turkey; [Yildirim, Canan] Okan Univ, Fac Med, Dept Pediat, Dept Pediat Neurol, TR-34959 Istanbul, Turkeyen_US
dc.descriptionKocaman, Canan/0000-0001-7736-3000; ACAR, Gonul/0000-0002-6964-6614en_US
dc.description.abstractAim: We aimed to compare the General Movement Assessment (GMA) and the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) in preterm infants for the prediction of cerebral palsy (CP) and neurodeve-lopmental delay (NDD). Additionally, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic compatibility of the General Movement Optimality Score (GMOS), the Motor Optimality Score (MOS), and AIMS for detecting CP and NDD.Method: Seventy-five preterm infants with gestational age (GA) 24-37 weeks were enrolled. Group 1 was composed of infants with 24-28 GA (n = 22); groups 2 and 3 consisted of infants with 29-32 GA weeks (n = 23) and 33-37 GA (n = 30) weeks, respectively. The infants were assessed during the writhing period, the fidgety period, and at 6-12 months of corrected age with GMOS, MOS, and AIMS, respectively.Results: In the writhing period, a cramped-synchronized pattern was observed in 17 (22%) in-fants, whereas a poor repertoire pattern was observed in 34 (45%) infants. In the fidgety period of the 63 infants, 29 (46%) presented with fidgety movements absent. The MOS and AIMS scores of the infants in group 1 were significantly lower than the other groups, which were statisti-cally significant (p = 0.004, p<0.00 1). High and positive compatibility (Kappa coefficient: 0.709; p = 0.001) was found between AIMS and GMOS scores and between AIMS and MOS scores (Kappa coefficient: 0.804; p < 0.001). In all groups, a statistically significant association was found between total GMOS scores (p = 0.003) and the presence of fidgety movements (p = 0.003). GMOS, MOS, and AIMS were found to be associated with CP and NDD (p < 0.001).Conclusion: GMA is an important tool for the prediction of CP and NDD. The combined use of GMOS, MOS, and AIMS may guide the clinical practice for the valid and reliable diagnosis of CP and NDD.Copyright 2022, Taiwan Pediatric Association. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/4.0/).en_US
dc.identifier.citation5
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.pedneo.2022.06.002
dc.identifier.endpage541en_US
dc.identifier.issn1875-9572
dc.identifier.issn2212-1692
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid35965235
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85136755878
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage535en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedneo.2022.06.002
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/976
dc.identifier.volume63en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000862320300014
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Taiwanen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectalberta Infant Motor Scaleen_US
dc.subjectcerebral palsyen_US
dc.subjectgeneral movement assessment optimality scoreen_US
dc.subjectmotor optimality scoreen_US
dc.subjectpreterm infantsen_US
dc.titleGeneral movements assessment and Alberta Infant Motor Scale in neurodevelopmental outcome of preterm infantsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files