Evaluation of Respiratory Function, Respiratory Muscle Strength, Physical Activity, and Functionality in Patients With Lower Extremity Lymphedema

dc.authorscopusid57789111900
dc.authorscopusid57218324164
dc.contributor.authorAydın, Gamze
dc.contributor.authorAydin, Gamze
dc.contributor.otherFizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon / Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-15T21:48:18Z
dc.date.available2025-01-15T21:48:18Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentOkan Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Demir, Zehra] Istanbul Okan Univ, Inst Grad Educ, Dept Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Aydin, Gamze] Istanbul Okan Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Div Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Tuzla Campus, TR-34959 Istanbul, Turkiyeen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Lymphedema is a chronic, progressive condition that has major physical and psychological consequences. It was aimed to examine the respiratory functions, respiratory muscle strength, physical activity level, and functionality of patients with lower extremity lymphedema and to compare them with healthy controls. Methods and Results: A total of 82 individuals (29.3% male, 70.7% female, with a mean age of 49.89 +/- 15.07 years) with lower extremity lymphedema (Group 1) and healthy individuals (Group 2) were included. Respiratory functions of the participants were evaluated by spirometry, respiratory muscle strength by maximum oral pressure measurements, physical activity levels using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF), functionality by Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) and Timed Up and Go test (TUG test). All respiratory function test measurements were lower in mean Group 1 than in Group 2 (p < 0.05). While inspiratory muscle strength did not differ between the groups (p > 0.05), expiratory muscle strength was lower in Group 1 than Group 2 (p < 0.05). Although spent time and energy for sitting were higher in Group 1 (p < 0.05), IPAQ vigorous-, moderate-, and light-intensity physical activity (MET-min/week) and IPAQ-total score did not differ between groups (p > 0.05). In Group 1, mean of LEFS score was lower and TUG test (seconds) in Group 1 was longer compared to Group 2 (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Respiratory functions, expiratory muscle strength, and functionality in patients with lower extremity lymphedema were adversely affected; however, inspiratory muscle strength and physical activity levels were similar to those of healthy controls.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexScience Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.citation0
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/lrb.2023.0079
dc.identifier.issn1539-6851
dc.identifier.issn1557-8585
dc.identifier.pmid39723451
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85213221636
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1089/lrb.2023.0079
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/7593
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001384429500001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebert, incen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectLymphedemaen_US
dc.subjectRespiratory Function Testen_US
dc.subjectMaximum Inspiratory Pressureen_US
dc.subjectFunctionalityen_US
dc.subjectPhysical Activityen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of Respiratory Function, Respiratory Muscle Strength, Physical Activity, and Functionality in Patients With Lower Extremity Lymphedemaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication8aeb1d04-c930-4c4b-b7d8-1046d6ad7686
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8aeb1d04-c930-4c4b-b7d8-1046d6ad7686
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication2716f181-034a-4b55-8c3a-27daffe8f3d4
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery2716f181-034a-4b55-8c3a-27daffe8f3d4

Files