An important contributing factor in dry eye disease: somatization

dc.authorscopusid57192301678
dc.authorscopusid57203572404
dc.authorscopusid57191543843
dc.contributor.authorYavrum, Fuat
dc.contributor.authorEzerbolat Ozates, Melike
dc.contributor.authorOzates, Serdar
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-25T11:37:31Z
dc.date.available2024-05-25T11:37:31Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentOkan Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Yavrum, Fuat] Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat Univ, Fac Med, Ophthalmol Dept, st 80, TR-07425 Kestel, Antalya, Turkiye; [Ezerbolat Ozates, Melike] Kalamis Psychiat Clin, Psychiat Dept, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Ozates, Serdar] Okan Univ, Fac Med, Ophthalmol Dept, Istanbul, Turkiyeen_US
dc.description.abstractPurposeSomatization is an important mental process that may causes medically unexplained and treatment-resistant somatic symptoms. The aim of the study is assess the presence of somatization in patients with dry eye disease (DED).MethodsEighty-eight patients with no objective DED finding and ongoing DED treatment were included in this prospective and observational study. Patients with subjective symptoms formed the symptom group and patients without subjective symptoms formed the control group. All patients were scored with the Turkish version of the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), Symptom Checklist-90-R (SCL-90R) somatization subscale, Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and Symptom Interpretation Questionnaire (SIQ).ResultsMean OSDI score was significantly higher in the symptom group than in the control group. The mean HAM-D and HAM-A outcomes did not differ between the groups. The mean SCL-90R somatization subscale, TAS, and PCS scores were significantly higher in the symptom group than in the control group. In the SIQ, somatic attributional style score was significantly higher in the symptom group than in the control group. The SCL-90R somatization subscale, PCS, and somatic attributional style scores had positive and mild-moderate correlation with OSDI scores in the symptom group. The TAS score had positive and moderate correlation with OSDI scores in all sample analyses.ConclusionSomatization should be considered in patients with DED with chronic ocular surface symptoms. Presence of subjective symptoms resistant to treatment may be an indicator of somatization.en_US
dc.identifier.citation0
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10792-024-03133-6
dc.identifier.issn0165-5701
dc.identifier.issn1573-2630
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid38652333
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85191095635
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-024-03133-6
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/1182
dc.identifier.volume44en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001207130300003
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectDry eye diseaseen_US
dc.subjectSomatizationen_US
dc.subjectAlexithymiaen_US
dc.subjectOcular surfaceen_US
dc.titleAn important contributing factor in dry eye disease: somatizationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files