Retrograde Pedal Access via Occluded Arteries in Endovascular Treatment of Critical Limb Ischemia
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2021
Authors
Uyanık,S.A.
Öğüşlü,U.
Yılmaz,B.
Çevik,H.
Atlı,E.
Gümüş,B.
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier Inc.
Open Access Color
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility and technical outcomes of retrograde access via occluded pedal arteries in endovascular treatment of critical limb ischemia (CLI) when the conventional antegrade approach fails. Materials and Methods: One hundred fifty-one patients with CLI (age 69 y ± 10.5; 116 men) who were not surgical candidates and were treated via retrograde pedal access between January 2016 and January 2018 were evaluated retrospectively. Seventy patients in whom retrograde access was performed through occluded arteries constituted the occluded group, and 81 patients who were treated via retrograde access from patent arteries constituted the nonoccluded group. Pedal access success, lesion crossing success, angiographic success, overall technical success, and procedure-related complications were evaluated and compared between groups. Results: Pedal access success (74 of 78 vs 83 of 87 attempts; P = .873) and lesion crossing success (64 of 78 vs 77 of 87 lesions; P = .340) were comparable between subgroups. Angiographic success (54 of 78 vs 77 of 87 lesions; P = .012) and overall technical success (48 of 70 vs 72 of 81 patients; P = .004) rates were lower in the occluded group. Procedure-related complications were similar between groups (P = .096). Conclusions: Retrograde pedal access from occluded pedal arteries is a feasible option when an antegrade approach fails in endovascular treatment of CLI. Although it has lower technical success, its use enables angiosome-directed therapy and has the potential to improve the outcomes of the procedure. © 2020 SIR
Description
Keywords
[No Keyword Available]
Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL
Fields of Science
Citation
5
WoS Q
Q2
Scopus Q
Q2
Source
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
Volume
32
Issue
2
Start Page
164
End Page
172