Evaluation of deformation and fracture rates for nickel-titanium rotary instruments according to the frequency of clinical use

dc.authoridYilmaz, Ayca/0000-0002-9254-7710
dc.authorwosidYilmaz, Ayca/X-5465-2019
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Ayca
dc.contributor.authorGokyay, Sitki Selcuk
dc.contributor.authorDaglaroglu, Rustu
dc.contributor.authorKucukay, Isil Karagoz
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-25T11:18:43Z
dc.date.available2024-05-25T11:18:43Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentOkan Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Yilmaz, Ayca; Gokyay, Sitki Selcuk; Daglaroglu, Rustu] Istanbul Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Endodont, Istanbul, Turkey; [Kucukay, Isil Karagoz] Okan Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Endodont, Istanbul, Turkeyen_US
dc.descriptionYilmaz, Ayca/0000-0002-9254-7710en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose To evaluate the deformation and fracture rates for ProTaper Universal (PTU) nickel-titanium rotary instruments according to the frequency of clinical use. Materials and Methods A total of 619 PTU instruments (S1, S2, F1, F2, and F3) that have been used in the clinic by a single endodontist were collected over a period of 4 years. These instruments were grouped on the basis of one to three (Group A), four to six (Group B) and seven to nine (Group C) clinical uses (one canal = one use). All instruments were evaluated by a blinded investigator under a stereomicroscope at 15x-45x magnification for the presence of deformation and fracture. Results The overall rates of deformation and fracture were 10% and 1.2%, respectively. The deformation and fracture rates for the S2, F1, and F2 instruments showed no significant differences among groups. However, fracture rate for S1 instruments in Group A was significantly higher than for those in Group B (p=0.025) and Group C (p=0.004). In Group C, the S1 instruments showed a significantly higher deformation rate compared with the S2 (p=0.04), F1 (p=0.008) and F2 (p=0.049) instruments; there were no other significant differences within groups. Conclusion Under the conditions of the current study, frequency of use seemed to influence the deformation rates of PTU rotary instruments. Except S1, these instruments could be used without any fracture or deformation in up to 9 clinical cases by an experienced endodontist.en_US
dc.identifier.citation1
dc.identifier.doi10.26650/eor.2018.461
dc.identifier.endpage93en_US
dc.identifier.issn2630-6158
dc.identifier.issn2651-2823
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid30775708
dc.identifier.startpage89en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid347361
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.26650/eor.2018.461
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/355
dc.identifier.volume52en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000488844500006
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherIstanbul Univ Press, Istanbul Univ Rectorateen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectNiTi rotary systemen_US
dc.subjectProTaper Universalen_US
dc.subjectdental instrumentsen_US
dc.subjectdeformationen_US
dc.subjectfractureen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of deformation and fracture rates for nickel-titanium rotary instruments according to the frequency of clinical useen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files