COST: Cognitive State Test, a brief screening battery for Alzheimer disease in illiterate and literate patients

dc.contributor.author Babacan-Yildiz, Gulsen
dc.contributor.author Isik, Ahmet T.
dc.contributor.author Ur, Emel
dc.contributor.author Aydemir, Emine
dc.contributor.author Ertas, Can
dc.contributor.author Cebi, Merve
dc.contributor.author Celebi, Arif
dc.date.accessioned 2024-05-25T11:25:15Z
dc.date.available 2024-05-25T11:25:15Z
dc.date.issued 2013
dc.description Çebi, Merve/0000-0002-2773-0367; ISIK, Ahmet Turan/0000-0001-5867-6503 en_US
dc.description.abstract Background: The aim was to develop a brief screening battery, Cognitive State Test (COST), for detecting the presence of dementia in both illiterate and literate patients and to assess its validity and reliability. Methods: COST is a cognitive screening tool that consists of almost all cognitive domains. It takes 5-7 minutes to administer, and has a maximum score of 30. Data were obtained from 114 healthy volunteers and 74 Alzheimer dementia (AD) patients. Subjects' age divided into two groups: A1: <65 years; and A2: >= 65 years and their education level divided into three groups: E1: illiterate; E2: 1-5 years; and E3: >= 6 years. For assessing concurrent validity, total COST score was compared to the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR), the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and Basic Activities of Daily Living (BADL). Sensitivity and specificity were determined through a discriminant analysis using the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves. Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach's coefficient alpha. Results: For normal and AD subjects, mean age was 64.9 +/- 9.8 years (50 women and 64 men) and 67.2 +/- 13.2 years (55 women and 19 men), respectively. Schooling ranged from 0-15 years (mean 5.7 +/- 4.2 and 3.3 +/- 3.8 years, respectively), and 21 and 37 subjects were illiterate, respectively. The COST significantly and positively correlated with MMSE and MoCA, and significantly and inversely correlated with CDR, the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), and BADL. In the E1, E2, and E3 education groups, the optimal cut-off points of COST chosen for diagnosis of AD were 23/24 (sensitivity: 81%, specificity: 99%), 24/25 (sensitivity: 75%, specificity: 86%), and 26/27 (sensitivity: 77%, specificity: 84%), respectively. When illiterate and literate subjects were then pooled, the optimal cut-off score of COST was 24/25, which yielded a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 87%. Reliability of the COST was good (0.86). Conclusion: The COST is a valid and reliable screening battery for detection of dementia both in the illiterate and the literate Alzheimer patients. en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount 38
dc.identifier.doi 10.1017/S1041610212001780
dc.identifier.issn 1041-6102
dc.identifier.issn 1741-203X
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-84873862004
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610212001780
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/865
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Cambridge Univ Press en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Alzheimer dementia en_US
dc.subject neuropsychological evaluation en_US
dc.subject screening battery en_US
dc.title COST: Cognitive State Test, a brief screening battery for Alzheimer disease in illiterate and literate patients en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.id Çebi, Merve/0000-0002-2773-0367
gdc.author.id ISIK, Ahmet Turan/0000-0001-5867-6503
gdc.author.scopusid 36458210900
gdc.author.scopusid 57201565533
gdc.author.scopusid 26649666500
gdc.author.scopusid 55596732300
gdc.author.scopusid 55596879900
gdc.author.scopusid 56728453100
gdc.author.scopusid 25627914000
gdc.author.wosid SOYSAL, Pinar/AAA-8894-2021
gdc.author.wosid Cebi, Merve/AAT-3751-2021
gdc.author.wosid Çebi, Merve/AAA-2168-2022
gdc.author.wosid Gursoy, Azize/IAN-9552-2023
gdc.coar.access metadata only access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.description.department Okan University en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Babacan-Yildiz, Gulsen; Gursoy, Esra; Kolukisa, Mehmet; Kocaman, Gulsen; Celebi, Arif] Bezmialem Vakif Univ, Dept Neurol, Fac Med, TR-34093 Istanbul, Turkey; [Isik, Ahmet T.; Aydemir, Emine; Soysal, Pinar] Bezmialem Vakif Univ, Dept Geriatr, Fac Med, TR-34093 Istanbul, Turkey; [Ur, Emel] Nevsehir Publ Hosp, Dept Neurol, Nevsehir, Turkey; [Ertas, Can] Okan Univ, Dept Psychol, Istanbul, Turkey; [Cebi, Merve] Bogazici Univ, Dept Psychol, Istanbul, Turkey en_US
gdc.description.endpage 412 en_US
gdc.description.issue 3 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q1
gdc.description.startpage 403 en_US
gdc.description.volume 25 en_US
gdc.description.wosquality Q1
gdc.identifier.pmid 23137551
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000314125300007
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.index.type PubMed
gdc.scopus.citedcount 38
gdc.wos.citedcount 36

Files