3D FEA of Hollow and Solid Design Zirconia Dental Dowels

dc.authoridYAY, Kubilay/0000-0003-3510-0864
dc.authoridKazazoglu, Ender/0000-0002-6450-9709
dc.authorscopusid8853818700
dc.authorscopusid25422219700
dc.authorscopusid7801509713
dc.authorscopusid6603167908
dc.authorwosidYAY, Kubilay/I-7610-2015
dc.authorwosidKazazoglu, Ender/ABM-1191-2022
dc.contributor.authorKayahan, Mehmet Baybora
dc.contributor.authorOzkurt-Kayahan, Zeynep
dc.contributor.authorYay, Kubilay
dc.contributor.authorKazazoglu, Ender
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-25T11:16:57Z
dc.date.available2024-05-25T11:16:57Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentOkan Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Kayahan, Mehmet Baybora] Okan Univ, Dept Endodont, Fac Dent, Istanbul, Turkey; [Ozkurt-Kayahan, Zeynep; Kazazoglu, Ender] Yeditepe Univ, Dept Prosthodont, Fac Dent, Istanbul, Turkey; [Yay, Kubilay] Istanbul Tech Univ, Automot Div, Fac Mech Engn, TR-80626 Istanbul, Turkeyen_US
dc.descriptionYAY, Kubilay/0000-0003-3510-0864; Kazazoglu, Ender/0000-0002-6450-9709en_US
dc.description.abstractPurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the stress distribution of hollow and solid design zirconia dowels. Materials and MethodsFinite element analysis (FEA) was used to investigate the influence of different dowel designs on the stress distribution of zirconia dowels. The coronal diameter of the dowel was 2.2 mm, the apical diameter was 1.8 mm, and the length was 15 mm. The diameter of the hollow space was 1.2 mm. Occlusal forces (both parallel and oblique) of 100 N were applied from the wider edge of the dowels simulating loads acting on the incisor during clenching and incising. The results were expressed in terms of von Mises criteria. ResultsFEA revealed differences in stress distribution. During parallel load, the maximum tensile stress of the hollow design (89.40 MPa) was greater than the solid design (43.30 MPa). During oblique load, the maximum tensile stress of the hollow design (1437.90 MPa) was greater than the solid design (917.96 MPa). The maximum deformation was observed in the coronal part of the dowel in both designs under the two load directions. ConclusionsFEA results showed that the hollow design zirconia dowels presented higher tensile stress.en_US
dc.identifier.citation1
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jopr.12289
dc.identifier.endpage234en_US
dc.identifier.issn1059-941X
dc.identifier.issn1532-849X
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid25865169
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84927581966
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage229en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12289
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/200
dc.identifier.volume25en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000374348300007
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectZirconiaen_US
dc.subjecthollow designen_US
dc.subjectfinite element analysisen_US
dc.title3D FEA of Hollow and Solid Design Zirconia Dental Dowelsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files