An Updated Comparison of Current Impression Techniques Regarding Time, Comfort, Anxiety, and Preference: a Randomized Crossover Trial
dc.authorwosid | Yilmaz, Hakan/Jvo-9077-2024 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yilmaz, Hakan | |
dc.contributor.author | Konca, Fatma Asli | |
dc.contributor.author | Aydin, Merve Nur | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-05-25T12:34:05Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-05-25T12:34:05Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.department | Okan University | en_US |
dc.department-temp | [Yilmaz, Hakan] Yeditepe Univ, Dept Orthodont, Fac Dent, Istanbul, Turkey; [Konca, Fatma Asli] Biruni Univ, Dept Orthodont, Fac Dent, Istanbul, Turkey; [Aydin, Merve Nur] Instanbul Okan Univ, Dept Paediat Dent, Fac Dent, Istanbul, Turkey | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: To compare digital and conventional impressions in terms of impression time, and comfort, anxiety, and preference of the patients. Methods: Digital scans (Trios 3 Cart) and conventional impressions (irreversible hydrocolloid material, hand-mixed) were randomly performed on 39 patients by a single experienced operator at 14-21-day intervals (crossover design). The impression time, comfort score with the visual analog scale, anxiety level with the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and preference with a questionnaire, were recorded. The 2 techniques were compared with the independent t-test in terms of time, comfort, and anxiety. Patient-operator assessment and time-comfort relationship were analyzed using Pearson's correlation test. Results: No statistical difference was found between the 2 impression techniques in terms of time (P = .231). Both the operators' and patients' comfort scores showed that the digital technique was found to be more comfortable (P < .001). There was no statistical difference between the 2 techniques with regard to anxiety (P = .668). The patients' and operators' comfort scores showed a strong correlation (P < .001), but no correlation was found between comfort and time (P > .05). Conclusion: Digital scanning and conventional dental impression were similar in terms of impression time and anxiety of patients. However, patients were more satisfied with the digital technique, and preferred it. | en_US |
dc.description.woscitationindex | Emerging Sources Citation Index | |
dc.identifier.citationcount | 1 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2021.21025 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 233 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2148-9505 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 35110223 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85128326377 | |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q2 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 227 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2021.21025 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 34 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000738706300004 | |
dc.identifier.wosquality | N/A | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Aves | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.scopus.citedbyCount | 1 | |
dc.subject | Intraoral Scanner | en_US |
dc.subject | Dental Impression | en_US |
dc.subject | Patient Comfort | en_US |
dc.subject | Dental Anxiety | en_US |
dc.subject | Clinical Efficiency | en_US |
dc.title | An Updated Comparison of Current Impression Techniques Regarding Time, Comfort, Anxiety, and Preference: a Randomized Crossover Trial | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |