Is there any predictive bone parameter for implant stability in 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional radiologic images?

dc.authoridARSAN, BELDE/0000-0002-8655-6186
dc.authoridYalçın Ülker, Gül Merve/0000-0002-7438-5834
dc.authorscopusid57192952426
dc.authorscopusid57192192045
dc.authorscopusid56568277100
dc.authorscopusid7007027219
dc.authorwosidARSAN, BELDE/ABG-5292-2020
dc.authorwosidYalçın Ülker, Gül Merve/IUP-8264-2023
dc.contributor.authorArsan, Belde
dc.contributor.authorYalcin-Ulker, Gul Merve
dc.contributor.authorMeral, Deniz Gokce
dc.contributor.authorErdem, Tamer Lutfi
dc.contributor.otherAğız,Diş ve Çene Cerrahisi / Oral, Dental and Maxillofacial Surgery
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-25T11:42:50Z
dc.date.available2024-05-25T11:42:50Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentOkan Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Arsan, Belde] Istanbul Okan Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Dentomaxillofacial Radiol, Istanbul, Turkey; [Yalcin-Ulker, Gul Merve; Meral, Deniz Gokce] Istanbul Okan Univ, Fac Dent, Oral & Maxillofacial Surg Dept, Istanbul, Turkey; [Erdem, Tamer Lutfi] Beykent Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Dentomaxillofacial Radiol, Istanbul, Turkeyen_US
dc.descriptionARSAN, BELDE/0000-0002-8655-6186; Yalçın Ülker, Gül Merve/0000-0002-7438-5834en_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives. This ex vivo study aimed to compare radiomorphometric parameters between 2-dimensional (2-D) and 3-dimensional (3-D) radiographs and evaluate the influence of preoperative radiologic bone parameters on the clinical outcomes of implant stability. Study Design. Implant recipient sites in fresh bovine blocks were evaluated on panoramic radiographs for gray value (GV), fractal dimension (FD), number of connected trabeculae (Co), and density of connected trabeculae (CoD). Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were evaluated for trabecular thickness (TbTh), cortical thickness (CTh), degree of anisotropy (DA), FD, and Co. Insertion torque (IT) and implant stability quotient (ISQ) were measured. Results. GV was significantly correlated with all parameters in 2-D and 3-D images except FD in 2-D and Co in 3-D, and with all surgical parameters (P <= .029). Co and CoD values on panoramic radiographs had significant correlation with TbTh, CTh, and DA values on CBCT images (P < .001). All 2-D parameters and TbTh and CTh in the CBCT data were significantly correlated with IT only (P <= .047). Only GV was correlated with ISQ measurements (P <= .029). Conclusion. GV, Co, and CoD values on panoramic radiographs reflect the architecture of trabecular bone and the thickness of cortical bone, and might help predict implant stability in clinical situations.en_US
dc.identifier.citation3
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.oooo.2020.08.009
dc.identifier.endpage379en_US
dc.identifier.issn2212-4403
dc.identifier.issn2212-4411
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid32891573
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85090147856
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage371en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2020.08.009
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/1641
dc.identifier.volume131en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000618789000017
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.institutionauthorYalçın Ülker, Gül Merve
dc.institutionauthorMeral, Deniz Gökçe
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Science incen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subject[No Keyword Available]en_US
dc.titleIs there any predictive bone parameter for implant stability in 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional radiologic images?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication190e5f69-3ae7-4324-a0a2-bff28498e167
relation.isAuthorOfPublication569f6281-7cf0-4d81-8f8d-887f1e3d4a15
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery190e5f69-3ae7-4324-a0a2-bff28498e167
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication9d7f58b2-6caf-4591-83fc-e79c39a149f4
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery9d7f58b2-6caf-4591-83fc-e79c39a149f4

Files