The effect of triangular cross-section neck design on crestal bone stability in the anterior mandible: A retrospective study with a 5-year follow-up

dc.authoridTokuc, Berkay/0000-0002-1149-2886
dc.authoridKan, Bahadir/0000-0001-6980-2085
dc.authorscopusid57216456295
dc.authorscopusid36183962200
dc.authorwosidTokuc, Berkay/JBR-8579-2023
dc.authorwosidKan, Bahadir/F-4799-2018
dc.contributor.authorTokuc, Berkay
dc.contributor.authorKan, Bahadir
dc.contributor.otherAğız,Diş ve Çene Cerrahisi / Oral, Dental and Maxillofacial Surgery
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-25T11:38:58Z
dc.date.available2024-05-25T11:38:58Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentOkan Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Tokuc, Berkay] Kocaeli Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, TR-41190 Kocaeli, Turkiye; [Kan, Bahadir] Okan Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Istanbul, Turkiyeen_US
dc.descriptionTokuc, Berkay/0000-0002-1149-2886; Kan, Bahadir/0000-0001-6980-2085en_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The objective of this study, which included a 5-year follow-up, was to compare peri-implant soft tissue health, crestal bone loss (CBL), and buccal bone thickness (BBT) around triangular cross-section neck (TN) or round neck (RN) implants, using cone-beam computed tomography.Materials and Methods: This study was initially designed as a prospective 1-year randomized controlled study and then extended with a 5-year retrospective evaluation of clinical and radiographic records. In the initial 1-year study, a total of 20edentulous patients receiving 40 implants with similar diameters were randomly assigned to the RN or TN groups using a split-mouth design. Pocket probing depths (PPD), plaque index (PI), and gingival index (GI) were recorded at postoperative month 12. CBL and BBT at three levels (0, -2, and -4 mm) were evaluated 1 year after insertion. Five years after insertion, PPD, PI, GI, CBL, and BBT were recorded as patients were recalled for clinical and radiographic monitoring.Results: Nineteen patients completed the study. After 5 years, no significant differences in PPD, PI, and GI scores and BBT values between the two groups (p > .05). The mean +/- SD CBL values at the final follow-up visit were -0.71 +/- 0.69 mm for TN and -1.03 +/- 0.86 mm for RN (p < .01).Conclusions: These results suggest better crestal bone preservation using implants with TN when compared to RN after a 5-year follow-up. However, TN showed similar results to RN regarding peri-implant soft tissue health and BBT.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors wish to thank MIS Implants Technologies, Turkey, for providing implants.; MIS Implants Technologies, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors wish to thank MIS Implants Technologies, Turkey, for providing implants.en_US
dc.identifier.citation0
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/clr.14190
dc.identifier.endpage1317en_US
dc.identifier.issn0905-7161
dc.identifier.issn1600-0501
dc.identifier.issue11en_US
dc.identifier.pmid37787153
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85173437988
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage1309en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14190
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/1312
dc.identifier.volume34en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001079566300001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.institutionauthorKan B.
dc.institutionauthorKan, Bahadır
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectbuccal bone thicknessen_US
dc.subjectcrestal bone lossen_US
dc.subjectneck designen_US
dc.subjectperi-implant soft tissueen_US
dc.subjecttriangular cross-section necken_US
dc.titleThe effect of triangular cross-section neck design on crestal bone stability in the anterior mandible: A retrospective study with a 5-year follow-upen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication37ea87f9-c176-4abc-9e40-da0c77f77ac6
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery37ea87f9-c176-4abc-9e40-da0c77f77ac6
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication9d7f58b2-6caf-4591-83fc-e79c39a149f4
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery9d7f58b2-6caf-4591-83fc-e79c39a149f4

Files