Biomechanical comparison of different prosthetic materials and posterior implant angles in all-on-4 treatment concept by three-dimensional finite element analysis

dc.authoridDESTE GOKAY, Gonca/0000-0002-5481-0063
dc.authorscopusid7005585860
dc.authorscopusid57714950500
dc.authorscopusid57222483984
dc.authorscopusid25822008700
dc.authorwosiddeste gökay, gonca/AAM-7219-2020
dc.contributor.authorGurbuz, Ayhan
dc.contributor.authorGuclu, Zekiye Begum
dc.contributor.authorGokay, Gonca Deste
dc.contributor.authorDurkan, Rukiye
dc.contributor.otherProtetik Diş Tedavisi / Prosthetic Dental Treatment
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-25T11:25:40Z
dc.date.available2024-05-25T11:25:40Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentOkan Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Gokay, Gonca Deste] Bursa Uludag Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Bursa, Turkey; [Gurbuz, Ayhan; Guclu, Zekiye Begum] Ankara Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Ankara, Turkey; [Durkan, Rukiye] Istanbul Okan Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Istanbul, Turkeyen_US
dc.descriptionDESTE GOKAY, Gonca/0000-0002-5481-0063en_US
dc.description.abstractThe study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical behaviors of different prosthetic materials and posterior implant angles in All-on-4 implant-supported fixed maxillary prostheses with three-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis. The model of complete edentulous maxilla was created using the Rhinoceros and VRMesh Studio programs. Anterior vertical and 17 degrees- and 30 degrees-angled posterior implants were positioned with All-on-4 design. Straigth and angled multi-unit abutments scanned using a 3D scanner. Two different prosthetic superstructures (monolithic zirconia framework and lithium disilicate veneer (ZL) and monolithic zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS)) were modeled. Four models designed according to the prosthetic structure and posterior implant angles. Posterior vertical bilateral loading and frontal oblique loading was performed. The principal stresses (bone tissues-Pmax and Pmin) and von Mises equivalent stresses (implant and prosthetic structures) were analyzed. In all models, the highest Pmax stress values were calculated under posterior bilateral loading in cortical bone. The highest von Mises stress levels occured in the posterior implants under posterior bilateral load (260.33 and 219.50 MPa) in the ZL-17 and ZL-30 models, respectively. Under both loads, higher stress levels in prosthetic structures were shown in the ZLS models compared with ZL models. There was no difference between posterior implant angles on stress distribution occurred in implant material and alveolar bone tissue. ZLS and ZL prosthetic structures can be reliably used in maxillary All-on-4 rehabilitation.en_US
dc.identifier.citation0
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/bmt-2022-0109
dc.identifier.endpage315en_US
dc.identifier.issn0013-5585
dc.identifier.issn1862-278X
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid35587648
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85130970662
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage307en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2022-0109
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/927
dc.identifier.volume67en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000797637200001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.institutionauthorDurkan R.
dc.institutionauthorDurkan, Rukiye
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWalter de Gruyter Gmbhen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectcomputer simulationen_US
dc.subjectdental prosthesisen_US
dc.subjectdental stress analysisen_US
dc.subjectimplant-supporteden_US
dc.subjectzirconiaen_US
dc.titleBiomechanical comparison of different prosthetic materials and posterior implant angles in all-on-4 treatment concept by three-dimensional finite element analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationbb6eaac4-8520-4ab0-94b6-3eeddb11c13e
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverybb6eaac4-8520-4ab0-94b6-3eeddb11c13e
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication436b3c72-243c-4a2c-b7b8-c99fdf2046c0
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery436b3c72-243c-4a2c-b7b8-c99fdf2046c0

Files