Does Ejaculation Have an Effect on Urinary Flow Rates

dc.authorid Erbay, Mehmet Erkan/0000-0002-3445-1761
dc.authorid Tarhan, Fatih/0000-0001-8168-0420
dc.authorwosid Erbay, Mehmet/Kdo-1147-2024
dc.authorwosid Tarhan, Fatih/Abe-7354-2020
dc.contributor.author Erkan Erbay, M.
dc.contributor.author Tarhan, Fatih
dc.date.accessioned 2024-05-25T12:19:19Z
dc.date.available 2024-05-25T12:19:19Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.department Okan University en_US
dc.department-temp [Erkan Erbay, M.] Okan Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Tarhan, Fatih] Univ Hlth Sci, Kartal Dr Lutfi Kirdar City Hosp, Clin Urol, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Erkan Erbay, M.] Cami Mah Sehitler Cd Erzan Mim Sitesi 8-11, TR-34940 Istanbul, Turkiye en_US
dc.description Erbay, Mehmet Erkan/0000-0002-3445-1761; Tarhan, Fatih/0000-0001-8168-0420 en_US
dc.description.abstract Introduction: The primary objective of this investigation is to explore the impact of ejaculation on urinary flow rates in men experiencing lower urinary tract symptoms. Materials and Methods: This study involved the enrollment of 55 male patients who presented with lower urinary tract symptoms. An assessment encompassed components, including medical history, questionnaires related to sexual activity and lower urinary tract symptoms, bladder diary, physical examination, urinalysis, urine culture, ultrasound examination and measurements of serum prostate-specific antigen, free flow uroflowmetry, and post-void residual urine volume. All participants were instructed to abstain from ejaculation for 3 days before undergoing uroflowmetry (UF1). Subsequently, they were required to ejaculate. Subsequent uroflowmetry assessments were conducted at 2 to 4 h (UF2) and 48 to 50 h (UF3) after ejaculation. No further ejaculations were permitted during this timeframe. Results: The patients had a mean age of 50.97 +/- 1.47 years. Statistically significant differences were observed in the mean values of Q(max) and corrected Q(max) (cQ(max)) between UF1 and UF2 measurements (p < 0.05). These differences were only in patients with benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the number of patients with Q(max) <15 mL/s showed a statistically significant difference between UF1 and UF2 measurements, specifically in the BPE group (p = 0.016). Conclusions: In this study, we have observed a significant and temporary increase in the Q(max) following ejaculation, particularly among patients with BPE. This indicates that ejaculation can potentially complicate the interpretation of uroflowmetry results. Therefore, further research is necessary to gain a more comprehensive understanding of this phenomenon. en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.citationcount 0
dc.identifier.doi 10.1002/nau.25467
dc.identifier.endpage 1558 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0733-2467
dc.identifier.issn 1520-6777
dc.identifier.issue 7 en_US
dc.identifier.pmid 38594885
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85190412344
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q2
dc.identifier.startpage 1553 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.25467
dc.identifier.volume 43 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:001198957400001
dc.identifier.wosquality Q3
dc.language.iso en
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Wiley en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.scopus.citedbyCount 0
dc.subject Ejaculation en_US
dc.subject Luts en_US
dc.subject Urinary Flow en_US
dc.subject Uroflowmetry en_US
dc.title Does Ejaculation Have an Effect on Urinary Flow Rates en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files