Evaluation of Respiratory Function, Respiratory Muscle Strength, Physical Activity, and Functionality in Patients With Lower Extremity Lymphedema

dc.authorscopusid 57789111900
dc.authorscopusid 57218324164
dc.contributor.author Demir, Zehra
dc.contributor.author Aydin, Gamze
dc.date.accessioned 2025-01-15T21:48:18Z
dc.date.available 2025-01-15T21:48:18Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.department Okan University en_US
dc.department-temp [Demir, Zehra] Istanbul Okan Univ, Inst Grad Educ, Dept Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Aydin, Gamze] Istanbul Okan Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Div Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Tuzla Campus, TR-34959 Istanbul, Turkiye en_US
dc.description.abstract Background: Lymphedema is a chronic, progressive condition that has major physical and psychological consequences. It was aimed to examine the respiratory functions, respiratory muscle strength, physical activity level, and functionality of patients with lower extremity lymphedema and to compare them with healthy controls. Methods and Results: A total of 82 individuals (29.3% male, 70.7% female, with a mean age of 49.89 +/- 15.07 years) with lower extremity lymphedema (Group 1) and healthy individuals (Group 2) were included. Respiratory functions of the participants were evaluated by spirometry, respiratory muscle strength by maximum oral pressure measurements, physical activity levels using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF), functionality by Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) and Timed Up and Go test (TUG test). All respiratory function test measurements were lower in mean Group 1 than in Group 2 (p < 0.05). While inspiratory muscle strength did not differ between the groups (p > 0.05), expiratory muscle strength was lower in Group 1 than Group 2 (p < 0.05). Although spent time and energy for sitting were higher in Group 1 (p < 0.05), IPAQ vigorous-, moderate-, and light-intensity physical activity (MET-min/week) and IPAQ-total score did not differ between groups (p > 0.05). In Group 1, mean of LEFS score was lower and TUG test (seconds) in Group 1 was longer compared to Group 2 (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Respiratory functions, expiratory muscle strength, and functionality in patients with lower extremity lymphedema were adversely affected; however, inspiratory muscle strength and physical activity levels were similar to those of healthy controls. en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.citationcount 0
dc.identifier.doi 10.1089/lrb.2023.0079
dc.identifier.issn 1539-6851
dc.identifier.issn 1557-8585
dc.identifier.pmid 39723451
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85213221636
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q3
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1089/lrb.2023.0079
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/7593
dc.identifier.wos WOS:001384429500001
dc.identifier.wosquality Q4
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Mary Ann Liebert, inc en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.scopus.citedbyCount 0
dc.subject Lymphedema en_US
dc.subject Respiratory Function Test en_US
dc.subject Maximum Inspiratory Pressure en_US
dc.subject Functionality en_US
dc.subject Physical Activity en_US
dc.title Evaluation of Respiratory Function, Respiratory Muscle Strength, Physical Activity, and Functionality in Patients With Lower Extremity Lymphedema en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.wos.citedbyCount 0

Files