Recommended Surgical Margins for Basal Cell Carcinoma: Is 3 mm Safe Enough?

dc.authoridUnverdi, Omer Faruk/0000-0001-8560-7300
dc.authorscopusid57189899199
dc.authorscopusid57212668744
dc.authorscopusid57215866198
dc.authorwosidYucel, Sercan/AAM-6053-2021
dc.authorwosidUnverdi, Omer Faruk/HLH-0757-2023
dc.contributor.authorUnverdi, Omer Faruk
dc.contributor.authorYucel, Sercan
dc.contributor.authorBerk, Osman Serdar
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-25T12:29:50Z
dc.date.available2024-05-25T12:29:50Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentOkan Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Unverdi, Omer Faruk] Istanbul Okan Univ, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Aesthet Surg, Sch Med, Istanbul, Turkey; [Yucel, Sercan] Kayseri City Hosp, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Aesthet Surg, Kayseri, Turkey; [Berk, Osman Serdar] Erciyes Univ, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Aesthet Surg, Kayseri, Turkeyen_US
dc.descriptionUnverdi, Omer Faruk/0000-0001-8560-7300en_US
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE The primary aim of treatment of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the complete excision of the tumor. Reconstruction of the defect after surgical excision varies, depending on the location and size of the defect and the skin to be used in the reconstruction. In this study, investigators compared the rates of tumor positivity at the edges of BCC specimens excised with 3- or 5-mm surgical margins. METHODS Researchers analyzed data related to 113 patients with a preliminary diagnosis of BCC between August 2016 and June 2018. In total, 99 lesions from 91 patients not exceeding 2 cm in size excised with 3-mm (n = 53) or 5-mm (n = 46) surgical margins were included. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi(2) test. RESULTS After histopathologic assessment, 3 of 53 lesions that were excised with 3-mm surgical margins had a positive surgical margin, whereas none of the 46 lesions excised with 5-mm margins indicated a positive tumor presence. However, there was no statistical difference between the groups. CONCLUSIONS A 3-mm surgical margin may be sufficient and safe for BCC excision.en_US
dc.identifier.citation7
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/01.ASW.0000655496.18027.59
dc.identifier.endpage212en_US
dc.identifier.issn1527-7941
dc.identifier.issn1538-8654
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid32195723
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85082146517
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage209en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000655496.18027.59
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/2149
dc.identifier.volume33en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000526728500007
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectbasal cell carcinomaen_US
dc.subjectcanceren_US
dc.subjectexcisionen_US
dc.subjectreconstructionen_US
dc.subjectsurgical marginen_US
dc.subjecttumoren_US
dc.subjectwound careen_US
dc.titleRecommended Surgical Margins for Basal Cell Carcinoma: Is 3 mm Safe Enough?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files